Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Julia Middendorf Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Friedsam vs J. Middendorf

Anna-Lena Friedsam

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.74m

Height

193

C. Rank

771

Best Rank

347

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$5.4K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Julia Middendorf

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.74m

Height

193

C. Rank

771

Best Rank

347

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$5.4K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Head-to-head: Friedsam 1 - 0 Middendorf

They have played 1 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 1 and Julia Middendorf winning 0. The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Julia Middendorf was at the W75 Ismaning, 06-11-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 3-0 ret..

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Friedsam	1
Middendorf	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) W75 Ismaning(11-06-24)

Stats

Anna-Lena Friedsam

Julia Middendorf

A. Friedsam vs J. Middendorf H2H Profile

A. Friedsam	Stats	J. Middendorf
$1,078,782	Career Prize Money	$5,362
60.00% (399-266)	Career Total W/L	56.34% (120-93)
1	Indoor	0
15	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-2)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Friedsam vs J. Middendorf Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 43.45% of points on their second serve, while Julia Middendorf has won 36.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anna-Lena Friedsam, in recent form, has won 50.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Julia Middendorf has won 53.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.52% and 26.60% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Anna-Lena Friedsam has saved 54.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Julia Middendorf has saved 47.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 64.41% of matches played (W/L 38/21), with Julia Middendorf winning 37.50% (W/L 3/5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Anna-Lena Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 123/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 16/19). Julia Middendorf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 11/5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Anna-Lena Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/14), where as Julia Middendorf has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 2/3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 0 times and Julia Middendorf being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 1 and Julia Middendorf winning 0.
The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Julia Middendorf was at the W75 Ismaning, 06-11-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 3-0 ret..
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:10:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anna-Lena Friedsam has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.02 while Julia Middendorf has played against players with an average rank of 679.38.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Julia Middendorf has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Anna-Lena Friedsam has converted 39.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Julia Middendorf has converted 46.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Julia Middendorf Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Friedsam vs J. Middendorf H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Friedsam	Stats	J. Middendorf
1	Sets Won	0
3	Games Won	0
1	Aces (Total)	1
0	Total Double Faults	1
0:10:0	Average Match Time	0:10:0
70% (7/10)	1st Serve %	38% (3/8)
71% (5/7)	1st Serve Win %	67% (2/3)
100% (3/3)	2nd Serve Win %	20% (1/5)
33% (1/3)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/0)
63% (5/8)	Return Points Win %	20% (2/10)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Open In Arte Angers Loire - Angers - 01-12-2025
R1 Teodora KostovicT. Kostovic	W	6-3 7-6(7)	Stats
Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F - 10-11-2025
Rubber 1 Jeline VandrommeJ. Vandromme	L	7-6(0) 2-6 6-3	Stats
Austin 125 - Austin - 03-11-2025
R1 Iva JovicI. Jovic	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Torneo Internazionale - Rovereto - 20-10-2025
QF Oksana SelekhmetevaO. Selekhmeteva	L	3-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
R2 Linda KlimovicovaL. Klimovicova	W	4-6 6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Middendorf Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W15 Kamen - 23-06-2025
R1 Lucie PetruzelovaL. Petruzelova	L	6-3 7-6(6)	Stats
W50 Troisdorf - 02-06-2025
Q1 Nina RadovanovicN. Radovanovic	L	7-5 4-6 6-1	Stats
W100 Wiesbaden - 28-04-2025
R1 Miriam Bianca BulgaruM. Bianca	L	1-6 6-0 6-2	Stats
Q3 Sapfo SakellaridiS. Sakellaridi	W	6-4 4-6 6-2	Stats
Q1 Tayisiya MordergerT. Morderger	W	6-3 7-6(1)	Stats

View All

A. Friedsam vs J. Middendorf Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Friedsam	Stats	J. Middendorf
60.00% (399/266)	YTD Win/Loss	56.34% (120/93)
58.04% (899/650)	Sets Win/Loss	52.85% (260/232)
53.49% (7697/6692)	Games Win/Loss	51.07% (2324/2227)
55.67% (108/86)	Hard Win/Loss	68.75% (11/5)
59.66% (139/94)	Clay Win/Loss	59.09% (91/63)
67.00% (136/67)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.90% (18/23)
45.71% (16/19)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.14
1586	Aces Total	321
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0.33
1710	Total Double Faults	729
1:11:49	Average Match Time	1:31:16
467.41	Average Opponent Rank	468.51
65% (22502/34674)	1st Serve %	60% (8145/13605)
65% (14678/22502)	1st Serve Win %	61% (4993/8145)
46% (5595/12170)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (2328/5460)
45% (1714/3774)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (846/1750)
43% (14623/34256)	Return Points Win %	46% (6345/13688)
36.84% (21/36)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
33.33% (10/20)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
33.33% (2/4)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
52.88% (101/90)	Main Tour W/L	28.57% (2/5)
67.95% (212/100)	Challenger W/L	50.94% (81/78)
76.81% (53/16)	Futures W/L	78.72% (37/10)
60% (390/651)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (117/208)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
52% (92/177)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	59% (23/39)
54% (123/229)	Deciding Set Win %	67% (47/70)
85% (392/335)	1st Set Won, Won Match	91% (96/87)
14% (392/56)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	9% (96/9)
23% (273/63)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	28% (116/32)